Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adjust evalpoly; close #313 #400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jverzani
Copy link
Member

Takes a faster evalpoly for vector coefficients from https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-have-a-much-faster-version-of-evalpoly-why-is-it-faster/79899. Also closes #313

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #400 (f812034) into master (6153edc) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #400      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.15%   83.16%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        2808     2810       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         2335     2337       +2     
  Misses        473      473              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/contrib.jl 82.41% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6153edc...f812034. Read the comment docs.

@jverzani jverzani merged commit 2ed6f21 into JuliaMath:master May 16, 2022
@jverzani jverzani deleted the eval_poly branch May 16, 2022 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Does polynomials.jl not work with Zygote?
1 participant