Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

switch to use ProtoBuf 0.9 #51

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2020
Merged

switch to use ProtoBuf 0.9 #51

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2020

Conversation

tanmaykm
Copy link
Member

Update to use ProtoBuf 0.9. Protocol specifications have been regenerated with ProtoBuf 0.9 and rest of the code and CI configuration have been updated accordingly.

@tanmaykm
switch to use ProtoBuf 0.9
e7e0ca7 
Update to use ProtoBuf 0.9. Protocol specifications have been regenerated with ProtoBuf 0.9 and rest of the code and CI configuration have been updated accordingly.
@tanmaykm
exclude generated files from coverage calculation
72116ed
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 21, 2020 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+27.7%) to 81.341% when pulling 72116ed on tan/protoupgrade into b61ad27 on master.

@tanmaykm tanmaykm merged commit 9f043f7 into master Oct 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@tanmaykm @coveralls