histogram bin labels are sometimes incorrect

[JohnHBrock]

The labels are sometimes correct, but other times they are out of order, or cover nonsensical ranges, so you may need to run these a few times to see the problem.

julia> histogram(rand(Int32, 10),bins=10)
                                ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ 
                 (-2.0e9,5.0e8] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1                   │ 
                 (-1.5e9,1.0e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1                   │ 
                 (-1.0e9,1.5e9] │ 0                                      │ 
                 (-5.0e8,2.0e9] │ 0                                      │ 
                    (0.0,2.5e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2 │ 
                  (5.0e8,3.0e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1                   │ 
   (1.0e9,3.9999999999999995e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2 │ 
   (1.5e9,3.9999999999999995e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1                   │ 
                  (2.0e9,5.0e9] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2 │ 
                                └────────────────────────────────────────┘ 

julia> histogram(rand(Float32, 10),bins=10)
                             ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ 
   (0.30000000000000004,0.1] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 4 │ 
                   (0.4,0.2] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2                   │ 
                   (0.5,0.3] │ 0                                      │ 
    (0.6000000000000001,0.4] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1                             │ 
    (0.7000000000000001,0.5] │▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2                   │ 
                   (0.8,0.6] │ 0                                      │ 
                             └────────────────────────────────────────┘

versioninfo():

Julia Version 0.3.8-pre+22
Commit 5078421* (2015-04-28 09:05 UTC)
Platform Info:
  System: Linux (x86_64-amazon-linux)
  CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  BLAS: libmkl_rt
  LAPACK: libmkl_rt
  LIBM: libimf
  LLVM: libLLVM-3.3

[Evizero]

Thanks for reporting. That is weird! I'll look into it

[Evizero]

this should be fixed in master now (not tagged). The histogram should now exactly show what the hist-method returns. Let me know if you still get weird results

[Evizero]

this should be fixed, so I am going to close this issue. Let me know if you still have issues