Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GenericExecutionStats has no field counters when using solve_problems #123

Closed
geoffroyleconte opened this issue Aug 5, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #124
Closed

GenericExecutionStats has no field counters when using solve_problems #123

geoffroyleconte opened this issue Aug 5, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #124
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@geoffroyleconte
Copy link
Member

Since the counters have been removed from the GenericExecutionStats type I have this error message when using solve_problems

┌ Error: caught exception
│   e = type GenericExecutionStats has no field counters

This does not seem to be shown in the breakage tests so I open an issue just in case.

@tmigot
Copy link
Member

tmigot commented Aug 8, 2022

I got something similar

┌ Warning: failed to run `@example` block in src/benchmark.md:124-126
│ ```@example ex1
│ print_pp_column(:neval_jac, stats) # with respect to number of jacobian evaluations
│ ```
│   c.value = ArgumentError: reducing over an empty collection is not allowed

when stats is the result of bmark_solvers in DCISolver.jl https://github.com/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/DCISolver.jl/runs/7733825128?check_suite_focus=true

@tmigot tmigot added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 8, 2022
geoffroyleconte added a commit to geoffroyleconte/SolverBenchmark.jl that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2022
geoffroyleconte added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2022
MonssafToukal pushed a commit to ProofOfConceptForJuliSmoothOptimizers/SolverBenchmark.jl that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants