New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pr/180 #181
Pr/180 #181
Conversation
Fixing the problem behind this PR is something myself and @quinnj have put on the back burner. The kwarg where a format is specified should cover edge cases, but there needs to be a better parsing of possible combinations out there. I'm not really fond of how R has this hurdle to their odd time series conversions. Here's the plan. Track down where in Dates.jl datetime is parsed and simply update the regex engine being used there. |
Would be helpful to merge the kwarg option so that it becomes usable in the master package version. Oftentimes I have to do multiple steps to reformat timestamps the way Even if a more robust regex parsing is introduced in the future (which may also depend on Julia 0.4 Base-dates support modifications), it is always helpful to have an option for the user to specify the exact format instead of hoping for correct parsing. |
Gotcha, good point. Not waiting for the perfect solution at the expense of a useful one. Let me get the documentation up to speed and we'll get this merged and tagged |
@multidis I changed the |
fwiw, the zoo package in R uses the simple |
gah, got this on nightlies
|
I'm going to merge this but hold off on tagging it until I can figure out what happened to |
This has been included in tag |
I pulled #180, corrected the path for the new tests