Fix nested Persistent IConfigNode #86
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…omConfig or CreateConfigFromObject
gotmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
…omConfig or CreateConfigFromObject (#86)
gotmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2023
…omConfig or CreateConfigFromObject (#86)
gotmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2023
…omConfig or CreateConfigFromObject (#86)
gotmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2023
…omConfig or CreateConfigFromObject (#86)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If a Persistent object with IConfigNode does CreateObject/LoadObject as its way of saving and loading, and the subobjects do the same, stock throws. This fixes that by encapsulating the readlinks/writelinks (and removeAfter) to the specific pass.