Save mesh #81
Merged
Save mesh #81
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
johannesring
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2023
|
@johannesring Good point, but I also don’t see negative side of having it in turtle. I will merge this for now, but we can always revert back and transfer the this to be inside fsipy/problem file :) |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the post-processing, we work a lot with mesh (fluid only mesh / solid only mesh / refined version of those two). Thus, I think it would make sense that
turtleFSIproduce a folder calledMeshand we can do post-processing within the result folder. Please let me know if you have any thoughts.