Switch speed test in README #640
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think we should have a comparison on the https://khan.github.io/KaTeX/ website, as something more visual than jsperf would be of benefit. |
|
Agreed. A nice plot of actual jsperf data, say, would be good. This PR is merely "best we can do with least effort". |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This switches the linked performance test from http://jsperf.com/katex-vs-mathjax/ (which is broken) to http://www.intmath.com/cg5/katex-mathjax-comparison.php as offered in #420. This seems preferable at least until we can get a working jsperf.com test again, maybe ideally one maintained by a maintainer of KaTeX.