Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

image on docker has not been built #40

Closed
simonm3 opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

image on docker has not been built #40

simonm3 opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@simonm3
Copy link

simonm3 commented Dec 2, 2016

The last build on docker hub is 3 months ago; and the dockerfile shown there is much smaller than the one on github. I am new to docker but I believe there is a setting to automatically build.

@nerdcha
Copy link
Contributor

nerdcha commented Dec 2, 2016

Yes, we used to use the auto-builds on Docker Hub. It's great, but it's designed for a certain style of Docker containers, where they're very specialised and only take a few minutes to build. Our type of image does not play well with it.

A few months ago, we switched to building all our images on our own worker machines, then doing a docker push to send them up to the Hub. You can see the latest push time in the subtitle of the Docker Hub page. If you do a docker pull kaggle/python, you'll get that latest image.

@simonm3
Copy link
Author

simonm3 commented Dec 2, 2016 via email

@nerdcha
Copy link
Contributor

nerdcha commented Dec 2, 2016

Ah, I see what you mean — it seems that Docker Hub stopped syncing the README and Dockerfile when we turned off the auto-builds. Yes, those are stale now but the image is definitely up to date.

@nerdcha
Copy link
Contributor

nerdcha commented Dec 2, 2016

The current and active versions of those files live in this very Github repo.

@simonm3
Copy link
Author

simonm3 commented Dec 2, 2016 via email

@nerdcha
Copy link
Contributor

nerdcha commented Dec 2, 2016

Doesn't seem possible without destroying and recreating the repo, but I've added a clarifying note to the Readme. Thanks for pointing that out!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants