Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Alternate database save methods #25

Closed
JadenDevon opened this issue Feb 10, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Suggestion: Alternate database save methods #25

JadenDevon opened this issue Feb 10, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@JadenDevon
Copy link

Could you make it so that the chunkloader database is saved as either a .db file or a .yml so that mySQL is not required?

@JadenDevon JadenDevon changed the title Suggestion: Alternate chunkloader database save methods Suggestion: Alternate database save methods Feb 10, 2018
@KasperFranz
Copy link
Owner

I haven't seen any good use cases where you would like it to be a SQLite database.

I don't have any plans on adding support for a yml based system.

Can you share in which use case you would use SQLite database?

@JadenDevon
Copy link
Author

Specifically in my case, when I first got the plugin, I had to ask my community founder to get access to a mySQL server. Then, the box that the database was on was shut down without my knowledge (which goes back to the issue that I had at that one point with an updated version of BCL). Then I had to wait a week while the community manager got in touch with our founder to get a new database set up. We lost the whole database and it could have been avoided if the file was stored locally in the MC server files.

@KasperFranz
Copy link
Owner

That is now in develop and will be part of 3.9

BetterChunkLoader automation moved this from To do to Done Nov 7, 2020
Project board automation moved this from To do to Done Nov 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Project board
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants