Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Contracts for static initializers not usable #1145

Open
wadoon opened this issue Dec 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Contracts for static initializers not usable #1145

wadoon opened this issue Dec 23, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@wadoon
Copy link
Member

wadoon commented Dec 23, 2022

This issue was created at git.key-project.org where the discussions are preserved.


  • Mantis: MT-1092
  • Submitted on: 2011-05-12 by (at)grahl
  • Updated: 2014-08-05

Description

When doing proofs with static initialization, contracts cannot be applied. Java+JML files with appropriate specs load just fine, but the "apply contract" rule is not selectable. See also #702.

Files

Associated Bugs

  • Relates to MT-702 with

History

  • (at)grahl -- (NEW_BUG) 2011-05-12

  • (at)grahl -- (BUG_ADD_RELATIONSHIP) 2011-05-12

  • (at)grahl -- (BUG_ADD_RELATIONSHIP) 2011-11-28

  • (at)grahl -- (BUG_ADD_RELATIONSHIP) 2013-07-23

  • (at)grahl -- (NORMAL_TYPE) 2014-01-03

  • (at)grahl -- (TAG_ATTACHED) 2014-08-05

Attributes

  • Category: JML (semantics)
  • Status: NEW
  • Severity: MINOR
  • OS:
  • Target Version:
  • Resolution: OPEN
  • Priority: LOW
  • Reproducibility: ALWAYS
  • Platform:
  • Commit: None
  • Build:
  • Tags [{'name': 'static'}]
  • Labels: ~JML (Semantics) ~Bug ~LOW

View in Mantis


Information:

  • created_at: 2017-05-29T02:57:22.294Z
  • updated_at: 2017-05-29T02:57:22.294Z
  • closed_at: None (closed_by: )
  • milestone:
  • user_notes_count: 0
@wadoon wadoon changed the title <placeholder> Contracts for static initializers not usable Dec 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant