V10/data types renames deletes (#530)

uSync.BackOffice/Extensions/uSyncActionExtensions.cs

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ public static bool ContainsErrors(this IEnumerable<uSyncAction> actions)
         ///  count how many actions in this list are for changes
         /// </summary>
         public static int CountChanges(this IEnumerable<uSyncAction> actions)
-            => actions.Count(x => x.Change > Core.ChangeType.NoChange);
+            => actions.Count(x => x.Change > Core.ChangeType.NoChange && x.Change < Core.ChangeType.Hidden);
 
         /// <summary>
         ///  checks to see if the reuqested action is valid for the configured list of actions.

uSync.BackOffice/SyncHandlers/Handlers/DataTypeHandler.cs

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ namespace uSync.BackOffice.SyncHandlers.Handlers
     ///  Handler to manage DataTypes via uSync
     /// </summary>
     [SyncHandler(uSyncConstants.Handlers.DataTypeHandler, "Datatypes", "DataTypes", uSyncConstants.Priorites.DataTypes,
-        Icon = "icon-autofill", EntityType = UdiEntityType.DataType)]
+        Icon = "icon-autofill", IsTwoPass = true, EntityType = UdiEntityType.DataType)]
     public class DataTypeHandler : SyncHandlerContainerBase<IDataType, IDataTypeService>, ISyncHandler, ISyncPostImportHandler,
         INotificationHandler<SavedNotification<IDataType>>,
         INotificationHandler<MovedNotification<IDataType>>,
@@ -61,25 +61,39 @@ public class DataTypeHandler : SyncHandlerContainerBase<IDataType, IDataTypeServ
         /// Datatypes have to exist early on so DocumentTypes can reference them, but
         /// some doctypes reference content or document types, so we re-process them
         /// at the end of the import process to ensure those settings can be made too.
+        /// 
+        /// HOWEVER: The above isn't a problem Umbraco 10+ - the references can be set
+        /// before the actual doctypes exist, so we can do that in one pass.
+        /// 
+        /// HOWEVER: If we move deletes to the end , we still need to process them. 
+        /// but deletes are always 'change' = 'Hidden', so we only process hidden changes
         /// </remarks>
         public override IEnumerable<uSyncAction> ProcessPostImport(string folder, IEnumerable<uSyncAction> actions, HandlerSettings config)
         {
             if (actions == null || !actions.Any())
                 return null;
 
-            foreach (var action in actions)
+            var results = new List<uSyncAction>(); 
+
+
+            // we only do deletes here. 
+            foreach (var action in actions.Where(x => x.Change == ChangeType.Hidden))
             {
-                var result = Import(action.FileName, config, SerializerFlags.None);
-                foreach (var attempt in result)
-                {
-                    if (attempt.Success && attempt.Item is IDataType dataType)
-                    {
-                        ImportSecondPass(action.FileName, dataType, config, null);
-                    }
-                }
+                var result = Import(action.FileName, config, SerializerFlags.LastPass);
+                results.AddRange(result);
+
+                //foreach (var attempt in result)
+                //{
+                //    if (attempt.Success && attempt.Item is IDataType dataType)
+                //    {
+                //        ImportSecondPass(action.FileName, dataType, config, null);
+                //    }
+                //}
             }
 
-            return CleanFolders(folder, -1);
+            results.AddRange(CleanFolders(folder, -1));
+
+            return results;
         }
 
         /// <summary>

uSync.BackOffice/SyncHandlers/SyncHandlerContainerBase.cs

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 using System.Collections.Generic;
 using System.IO;
 using System.Linq;
+using System.Xml.Linq;
 
 using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Cache;
 using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Models;
@@ -173,5 +174,26 @@ private void ProcessContainerChanges(IEnumerable<EntityContainer> containers)
                 }
             }
         }
+
+        /// <summary>
+        ///  Does this item match the one in a given xml file? 
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <remarks>
+        ///  container based tree's aren't really trees - as in things can't have the same 
+        ///  name inside a folder as something else that might be outside the folder.
+        ///  
+        ///  this means when we are comparing files for clean up, we also want to check the 
+        ///  alias. so we check the key (in the base) and if doesn't match we check the alias.
+        ///  
+        ///  under default setup none of this matters because the name of the item is the file
+        ///  name so we find/overwrite it anyway, 
+        ///  
+        ///  but for guid / folder structured setups we need to do this compare. 
+        /// </remarks>
+        protected override bool DoItemsMatch(XElement node, TObject item)
+        {
+            if (base.DoItemsMatch(node, item)) return true;
+            return node.GetAlias().InvariantEquals(GetItemAlias(item));
+        }
     }
 }

uSync.Backoffice.Assets/App_Plugins/uSync/components/usync.reportview.component.js

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
         /////////
 
         function showChange(change) {
-            return vm.showAll || (change !== 'NoChange' && change !== 'Removed');
+            return vm.showAll || (change !== 'NoChange' && change !== 'Removed' && change !== 'Hidden');
         }
 
         function hasFailedDetail(details) {
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
         function countChanges(changes) {
             var count = 0;
             angular.forEach(changes, function (val, key) {
-                if (val.change !== 'NoChange') {
+                if (val.change !== 'NoChange' && val.change !== 'Hidden') {
                     count++;
                 }
             });

uSync.Backoffice.Assets/App_Plugins/uSync/settings/usync.controller.js

@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@
         function countChanges(changes) {
             var count = 0;
             angular.forEach(changes, function (val, key) {
-                if (val.change !== 'NoChange') {
+                if (val.change !== 'NoChange' && val.change !== 'Hidden') {
                     count++;
                 }
             });

uSync.Core/ChangeType.cs

@@ -50,7 +50,15 @@ public enum ChangeType : int
         Mismatch,
 
         [EnumMember(Value = "ParentMissing")]
-        ParentMissing
+        ParentMissing,
+
+        /// <summary>
+        ///  Hidden changes, don't show up in the UI
+        ///  but they are processed like changes, so 
+        ///  get passed to second and last pass attempts
+        /// </summary>
+        [EnumMember(Value = "Hidden")]
+        Hidden = 101
     }
 
 }

uSync.Core/Serialization/SerializerFlags.cs

@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ public enum SerializerFlags
         OnePass = 2, // do this in one pass
         DoNotSave = 4, // don't save 
         FailMissingParent = 8, // fail if the parent item is missing
-        CreateOnly = 16 // only create, if the item is already there we don't overwrite.          
+        CreateOnly = 16, // only create, if the item is already there we don't overwrite.          
+        FirstPast = 32, // this is the first pass, sometime we might not do stuff on first pass.
+        SecondPass = 64, // this is the second pass
+        LastPass = 128, // this is the last pass. 
+
     }
 }

uSync.Core/Serialization/Serializers/DataTypeSerializer.cs

@@ -52,6 +52,44 @@ public class DataTypeSerializer : SyncContainerSerializerBase<IDataType>, ISyncS
             };
         }
 
+        /// <summary>
+        ///  Process deletes
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <remarks>
+        ///  datatypes are deleted late (in the last pass)
+        ///  this means they are actually deleted at the very
+        ///  end of the process. 
+        ///  
+        ///  In theory this should be fine, 
+        ///  
+        ///  any content types that may or may not use
+        ///  datatypes we are about to delete will have
+        ///  already been updated. 
+        /// 
+        ///  by moving the datatypes to the end we capture the 
+        ///  case where the datatype might have been replaced 
+        ///  in the content type, by not deleting first we 
+        ///  stop the triggering of any of Umbraco's delete
+        ///  processes.
+        ///  
+        ///  this only works because we are keeping the track of
+        ///  all the deletes and renames when they happen
+        ///  and we can only reliably do that for items
+        ///  that have ContainerTree's because they are not 
+        ///  real trees - but flat (each alias is unique)
+        /// </remarks>
+        protected override SyncAttempt<IDataType> ProcessDelete(Guid key, string alias, SerializerFlags flags)
+        {
+            if (flags.HasFlag(SerializerFlags.LastPass)) 
+            {
+                logger.LogDebug("Processing deletes as part of the last pass)");
+                return base.ProcessDelete(key, alias, flags);
+            }
+
+            logger.LogDebug("Delete not processing as this is not the final pass");
+            return SyncAttempt<IDataType>.Succeed(alias, ChangeType.Hidden);
+        }
+
         protected override SyncAttempt<IDataType> DeserializeCore(XElement node, SyncSerializerOptions options)
         {
             var info = node.Element(uSyncConstants.Xml.Info);