Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider options for CI speed-up #189

Open
lasalvavida opened this issue Jul 1, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #269
Open

Consider options for CI speed-up #189

lasalvavida opened this issue Jul 1, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #269

Comments

@lasalvavida
Copy link
Contributor

lasalvavida commented Jul 1, 2018

On building with Docker:

I'm only familiar with this on GitLab CI and don't know the details of how Travis and Appveyor handle this, so take it with a grain of salt.

When you do docker builds in GitLab CI it effectively caches the state of the project as a container snapshot. That way when you make a change, it just pulls in the delta and likewise CMake + make will only have to rebuild the delta which can save a lot of time on builds in CI.

Generally this works well, so if it's possible to do something similar in Travis and Appveyor it will help build times in a much friendlier way than the current approach of downloading pre-compiled libs from older builds.

@lasalvavida lasalvavida changed the title Consider transition to docker builds Consider options for CI speed-up Jul 1, 2018
@lasalvavida
Copy link
Contributor Author

We can probably accomplish the same thing with a more judicious caching scheme. This wasn't very well supported when I first implemented CI, so I think we'll give that another shot first since it seems like it has become better supported on both Travis and Appveyor.

@lasalvavida lasalvavida linked a pull request Jul 4, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant