Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BoxInterleaved model does not display correctly #496

Closed
erich666 opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

BoxInterleaved model does not display correctly #496

erich666 opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@erich666
Copy link

Steps to reproduce: go to https://github.khronos.org/glTF-Sample-Viewer-Release/ and choose the model BoxInterleaved. Screenshot:

image

I'm using Chrome on Windows. I get the same results on Microsoft Edge on Windows.

Compare this to say https://asset-explorer.needle.tools/BoxInterleaved or drop the model at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Assets/tree/main/Models/BoxInterleaved into say https://gltf-viewer.donmccurdy.com/, where you get (after adjusting the camera) something like:

image

Note: there was a bug filed about BoxInterleaved five years ago that was closed, so this model evidently displayed correctly at some point. Regression?

@echadwick-artist
Copy link
Contributor

echadwick-artist commented Sep 25, 2023

Perhaps related... I get a similar result in the glTF Sample Viewer with a model exported using Autodesk's built-in glTF exporter for 3ds Max.
UV0-dual-paraboloid_UV1-equirect.zip

It passes the glTF Validator, with a single Info about a non pow2 texture.

How it renders in glTF Sample Viewer Release (https://github.khronos.org/glTF-Sample-Viewer-Release/):
2023-09-24 21_39_09-glTF Sample Viewer

How it renders in UX3D's development version (http://gltf.ux3d.io/):
2023-09-24 21_40_33-glTF Sample Viewer

(Edit: fix for UX3D broken link)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants