Add LPF-C012303S Lightpipe

[ghost]

Add LPF-C012303S Lightpipe

---

All contributions to the kicad library must follow the KiCad library convention

Thanks for creating a pull request to contribute to the KiCad libraries! To speed up integration of your PR, please check the following items:

• Provide a URL to a datasheet for the footprint(s) you are contributing
• An example screenshot image is very helpful
• If there are matching symbol or 3D model pull requests, provide link(s) as appropriate
• Check the output of the Travis automated check scripts - fix any errors as required
• Give a reason behind any intentional library convention rule violation.

• Datasheet: https://www.lumex.com/spec/LPF-C012303S.pdf
• I was not sure in which library I should put this; none seemed to fit, so I created a new one. I am open for suggestions and happy to move it to another lib.
• The additional circles on the F.Fab layer indicate the optimal LED-position
• Some of the coordinates of the lines are ugly; I drew this mixed imperial/metric. It this is an issue, I can rework it.

[ghost]

Travis fails since the new library does not exist in fp-lib-table.
I ran the python check lib scripts locally, no error was reported.

[poeschlr]

@cp-aquila said:

Travis fails since the new library does not exist in fp-lib-table.

Add the lib to the lib table then ;)

---

Edit: Or add this to the OptoDevice library (Might be the better opition as i doubt that we will ever have a high number of such devices.)

[poeschlr]

Sorry for the delay.

Is it possible that the datasheet suggests either four rectangular cutouts or for SMD pads. Ok i get it now. These are the suggested pads for the LEDs and are represented by your small crosses on the fab laye

---

Also i just checked out the dimensions of your part and you do seem to have used imperial instead of metric like is both suggested by the datasheet and by kicad in general.

[ghost]

Hi,

Thanks for the review.
But I fail to understand what the suggested changes are (Pending changes label). Its not clear to me from the last comments.

[poeschlr]

If a datasheet contains both metric and imperial we will use the metric dimensions to check your part. I did that and it failed every measurement. So instead of making a drawing of only red dimensions i simply told you to use the metric dimensions.

Edit: In this case i do not even need to point to kicads rules. Metric is the main dimension used in the datasheet and imperial is only added as a legacy reference.

[poeschlr]

Sorry it took so long, I kind of missed that this got updated.

[ghost]

Sorry it took so long, I kind of missed that this got updated.

Nevermind, I was pretty slow in the beginning myself.
Thanks for the patience and review!