Added most Atlassian products

[Mika56]

Hi,

As a developer, I cannot recommend Atlassian products enough. They are very well done softwares that I use everyday in my job.
Although not free, the first pricing tier is affordable ($10 per year for 10 users) and can be self-hosted

[nodiscc]

Thanks; Few remarks about added software

• Hipchat:
  • I'd better link to https://www.hipchat.com/server, which is the self-hostable software page itself
  • Uses a third party service (our cloud-based video servers) for video streams (video can be disabled) (https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/HC/HipChat+Server+FAQs)

Other products have both a "Cloud" based version, and a "Server" (self-hostable) version, for a price. No source code is available.

@Mika56 What happens when the atlassian subscription ends, and you're using a self-hosted edition? Does the product lock itself?

[Mika56]

Nice catch about video streams being sent to their cloud servers, I didn't know that!
Do you want me to submit a new PR?

About subscriptions, this is true for all products, be here's the link for JIRA: https://www.atlassian.com/licensing/jira#serverlicenses-9
Short answer, when your subscription ends, you will not get access to newer versions, but your can still use the software (Perpetual JIRA use).

You can, indeed, use their cloud solutions, be we're here to speak self-hosting :)
Anyway, you can get access to their source code if you go over the 10 users price, but that licence does not come with all rights (https://www.atlassian.com/end-user-agreement/ section 6.3 Your Modifications)

[nodiscc]

you will not get access to newer versions, but your can still use the software (Perpetual JIRA use).

Sounds fair to me.

Nice catch about video streams being sent to their cloud servers, I didn't know that! Do you want me to submit a new PR?

What should we do?

• Add a footnote/special symbol for software that sends data to third party services?
• Leave it as is, expect users to investigate limitations since it's marked as proprietary?
• Remove it if we decide use of third party servers/backends is a criteria for removal.

I need some time to think about it, but I'd be ok for removal of such software (privacy implications, business implications) if we all agree. Ping @Kickball

[Mika56]

I'd say every software is different. In our case, there is indeed traffic sent to cloud servers, but on a functionality that can be disabled. We could add something like
Privacy issues [1]
With a footnote:

[1]: HipChat uses their cloud services for 1:1 video conversations. See One-to-One Video Chat

[Kickball]

I think that the best way to handle this would be the footnote as @Mika56 suggested in the above comment.

If we could add the Atlassian products with footnotes for Privacy Issues as needed that would be great.