We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
After fixing #201 the jacoco report still does not work as intended. Note - with intellij engine everything is ok.
The jacoco report contains all of the possible packages for a given module. It does not change with class filters or with html filters.
Precisely, setting the class filters excludes exact coverage values from the report which results with 0% in the report.
Setup:
kover { ... filters { classes { excludes.addAll( "com.companyxyz.package.*", "*.di.*" ) } }
Tried also to set
htmlReport { overrideFilters { classes { excludes.addAll( "com.companyxyz.package.*", "*.di.*" ) } } }
but with no luck. The report contains all possible packages. The excluded ones shows simply 0% of coverage.
Am I doing something wrong with the jacoco setup?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, when solving issue #201, I added filtering only to the instrumentation. Now need to add a class-file filter for the JaCoCo reporter
Sorry, something went wrong.
Added JaCoCo reports filtering
3275f59
Fixes #220
633aebf
Fixed in 0.6.1
0.6.1
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
After fixing #201 the jacoco report still does not work as intended.
Note - with intellij engine everything is ok.
The jacoco report contains all of the possible packages for a given module. It does not change with class filters or with html filters.
Precisely, setting the class filters excludes exact coverage values from the report which results with 0% in the report.
Setup:
Tried also to set
but with no luck. The report contains all possible packages. The excluded ones shows simply 0% of coverage.
Am I doing something wrong with the jacoco setup?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: