Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DKIM validation #82

Closed
Tracked by #16
wez opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #16

DKIM validation #82

wez opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
receiving Relates to inbound/reception-time processing

Comments

@wez
Copy link
Collaborator

wez commented Sep 13, 2023 •
edited

Support validation of DKIM signature(s) and generation of appropriate Authentication Results headers
@wez wez mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2023
Open
@wez wez added the receiving Relates to inbound/reception-time processing label Sep 13, 2023
wez added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@wez
mailparsing: add support for Authentication-Results header
179723e 
This commit enables parsing and constructing AuthenticationResults
according to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8601

refs: #82
wez added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@wez
dkim: have verification return Vec<AuthenticationResult>
92332a7 
Replaces the dkim result types from this crate with
AuthenticationResults which contain the additional
data required to construct high-quality Authentication-Result
headers.

refs: #82
wez added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@wez
add msg:dkim_verify()
e4bb5d6 
This method returns an array of AuthenticationResult reflecting
the verification status.

refs: #82
wez added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@wez
add msg:add_authentication_results
06bb8d0 
This method will prepend an Authentication-Results header
to the message with the specified set of results and
local server name.

We need a more convenient way to default the server name;
ideally we'd pick this up from the listener, but that is currently
awkward in the policy.

refs: #82
wez added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@wez
docs: show how to use dkim verification
3b10d63 
refs: #82
@wez wez closed this as completed Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
receiving Relates to inbound/reception-time processing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wez