Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping to schema.org #5

Open
nicholascar opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Mapping to schema.org #5

nicholascar opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor

Mapping of metadata elements to the general-purpose Knolwedge Graph model schema.org

@MetadataToolsARDC
Copy link

For the schema.org harvest to Research Data Australia, ARDC has been recommending that contributors apply the conventions of https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org when constructing (Dataset, etc..) metadata. The mapping from ANZGeoDCAT to schema.org could go beyond, in a similar way - i.e. to maintain a mapping to the latest (evolving) https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org recommendations.

@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicholascar commented Dec 13, 2022

Ah ha, I knew I'd missed a well-known DCAT/schema.org mapping, the ESIP one! I added two others to the stub mapping document (schema.org's own Dataset info (https://schema.org/docs/data-and-datasets.html) and the European commission's info on DCAT-AP/schema.org (https://ec-jrc.github.io/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/)) but I'll add this one. This is actually the one I know best having worked with some of the authors when it was established, but I forgot about it when creating the mapping document stub. Re-added now: https://linked.data.gov.au/def/anzgeodcat/sdo

If this particular mapping is the ARDC favourite, let's assume we will follow this one unless something comes along to cause us to reconsider.

Thanks @MetadataToolsARDC

@MetadataToolsARDC
Copy link

Thank you Nick

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants