Improved linear evaluation that achieves better results

[teasgen]

In the updated linear evaluation, the calculation process involves dividing the dataset into three parts: train, validation, and test. However, if the dataset does not already have a validation split, I will divide the train part into two sections based on the specified proportion.
It means we will get more fair results.
Also I've added regularization with openAI hyperparameter sweep (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.00020.pdf A.3).
Now the results are more similar to openAI metrics for CLIP models (same paper, table 10)

e.g. ViT-L-14 openai model

Metric	Current	New	openAI	diff decrease
DTD dataset	80.1	82.1	82.1	-2.0
Country211	38.7	42.1	42.9	-1.4
Food101	93.4	95.3	95.2	-1.9
Aircraft	62.4	67.5	69.4	-4.1
Cifar100	84.8	87.3	87.5	-2.5
Cifar10	97.7	98.0	98.0	-0.3

Hyperparameters	Value
Batch size	512
Epochs	20
LR	0.1

[Danil328]

Approve, please

[mehdidc]

Sorry for the delay an thank you very much for the PR @teasgen . I will have a look right after fixing #109

[ankitkv]

Hi @teasgen ! Do you happen to know the best setting to use your PR for linear probe on ImageNet?

[teasgen]

Hi @teasgen ! Do you happen to know the best setting to use your PR for linear probe on ImageNet?

Hi, unfortunately I haven't tested my PR on ImageNet. But you can efficiently find best hyperparameters using cli arguments. However, I used same setting for all datasets, so you can firstly try it

[mehdidc]

Hi @teasgen, working fine for me! the only thing that would be nice to keep is the default behavior, i.e. not specifying a validation dataset. Currently, it fails with an error message if validation set or validation proportion are not given. With this commit: 396f807, I could make it working fine again, but I might have missed something. Could you please have a look/confirm ?

Thanks!

[teasgen]

Hi @teasgen, working fine for me! the only thing that would be nice to keep is the default behavior, i.e. not specifying a validation dataset. Currently, it fails with an error message if validation set or validation proportion are not given. With this commit: 396f807, I could make it working fine again, but I might have missed something. Could you please have a look/confirm ?

Thanks!

Hi! Your commit looks good, I suppose now its alright. Could you please release new version to pypi as soon as pr will be merged?

[mehdidc]

Great, thanks @teasgen!
yes, sure, will release a new version on pypi!

[mehdidc]

Merging, will add the other commit right after.

[mehdidc]

@teasgen @Danil328 available now in 1.6.0, pip install clip_benchmark==1.6.0