Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Block size processing issue? Sine wave glitches #1162

Closed
harryhaaren opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Block size processing issue? Sine wave glitches #1162

harryhaaren opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@harryhaaren
Copy link

Hey,

I'm chatting with LtRiplet on irc #lmms, and there seems to be a block-size issue with Triple-Osc:
As described in IRC:

<LtRipley> i click on the triple oscillator and turn the knobs for sine 2 and 3 to 0
<LtRipley> the bug still happens without turning any knob, it is just more obvious. Then play any note.

Screenshots of what should be a sine wave look like this:
lmms_sine
Based on the periodic nature of the glitch, i'd guess its a block-size processing issue somehow: either parameters aren't updated as they should be, or some samples are being skipped.

Update:
Just been informed that Linux/JACK was being used, and Linux/ALSA doesn't have the same issue.

Cheers, -Harry

@Sti2nd
Copy link
Contributor

Sti2nd commented Sep 17, 2014

Thank you for the info :) I guess we already know Jack should be supported better, but we don't have devs for everything.

@tresf tresf added the bug label Dec 17, 2014
@tresf tresf mentioned this issue Dec 19, 2014
13 tasks
@tresf
Copy link
Member

tresf commented Dec 19, 2014

Consolidated to #1467, "Better JACK support" issue.

@tresf tresf closed this as completed Dec 19, 2014
@serdnab
Copy link
Contributor

serdnab commented Oct 3, 2019

It is not a problem of lmms, but it is a normal jack behavior when an xrun occurs, try to increase the latency in the jack server and you will see how the artifacts disappear.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants