建议每月发布一个release，而不是github actions

[SekiBetu]

建议每月发布一个release，而不是github actions，这样原仓库应该就没问题了

[Howard20181]

不知道会不会有版权问题
而且发布Release之后下载量大也不行，之前OpenGapps就迁移了

[SekiBetu]

那没办法了，十万个fork，经常build，把微软服务器干趴下了属于是，要么release放在谷歌盘之类的地方吧，没有版权问题的吧，WSA内核是开源的吧

[Howard20181]

现在Github没有回应是什么原因禁用

[PeterNjeim]

I don't like it when companies don't specify what term of the ToS was violated, it's not transparent. But of course, we all know that the old repository abused GitHub Actions, and even I called you guys out on that, and released my own fork that used Releases instead of Actions (mainly because it's way faster (47x faster) and more reliable anyways). Unfortunately, since it was a fork, my repository got disabled as well. I am now in contact with GitHub to reinstate my repository. If they do, then I will report back here and confirm that it wasn't a copyright issue. If they deny my request, then we can safely say that it would be a copyright issue and that this local method is the correct way forward.

[PeterNjeim]

@Howard20181
They replied to me, it is confirmed an Actions issue. If you use Releases like I did I'm sure it wouldn't violate their policies.

[PeterNjeim]

@Howard20181 My repository just got banned just like your old one lol. I'm contacting them right now to see if Releases are also a problem, or if it's a copyright issue.

Update: it was banned for the exact same reason as your old one (picture in my previous comment). Literally the same two points. However the final sentence was different. Instead of mentioning an undue burden through the use of Actions, they said that it was due to the "nature and volume of the prohibited activity".