Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Supernova statistic should have an associated tracer type in SACC #317

Open
am610 opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 Discussed in #314 · 1 comment
Open

The Supernova statistic should have an associated tracer type in SACC #317

am610 opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 Discussed in #314 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@am610
Copy link
Member

am610 commented Sep 21, 2023

Discussed in #314

Originally posted by marcpaterno September 5, 2023
Currently, the Supernova statistic uses a tracer of type sacc.tracers.MiscTracer (see https://sacc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tracers.html).

Should it instead have a dedicated tracer type? It would seem that this would at the very least help prevent misconfigurations of programs, helping to avoid the reading of wrong tracers from the SACC data.

What would the features of this type be?

Would someone working with the Supernova statistic in analysis volunteer to take on implementing such a thing?

@marcpaterno marcpaterno changed the title Should the Supernova statistic have an associated tracer type in SACC? The Supernova statistic should have an associated tracer type in SACC Sep 27, 2023
@marcpaterno
Copy link
Collaborator

Please see discussion #314 for the proposal on how to implement this feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants