Patch goldenspike

[eacharles]

Problem & Solution Description (including issue #)

Code Quality

• My code follows the code style of this project
• I have written unit tests or justified all instances of #pragma: no cover; in the case of a bugfix, a new test that breaks as a result of the bug has been added
• My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation for future maintainers; the change is reflected in applicable demos/tutorials (with output cleared!) and added/updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format
• Any breaking changes, described above, are accompanied by backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (87897a6) 100.00% compared to head (a037767) 100.00%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head a037767 differs from pull request most recent head 43502bc. Consider uploading reports for the commit 43502bc to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #107   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            1         1           
=========================================
  Hits             1         1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sschmidt23]

I think you wan the same nondetect_val=np.nan in the make stage for the inform stages for BPZ and FlexZBoost as well, and the estimate stage of FlexZBoost, even if they don't cause NaNs in the notebook. But, I'll mark as approved.