Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not?

[arhik]

No description provided.

[lfiondella]

Probably not. This was an alternative way to find required testing time. However, you can leave it. There are other metrics that use it, but we haven't implemented them yet.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Karthik Katipally" notifications@github.com
To: "arhik/srt.core" srt.core@noreply.github.com
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 10:58:17 AM
Subject: [srt.core] Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not? (#9)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .

[arhik]

@lfiondella Can i just swap FT and FN columns for inverse of MVF. It was how i did it before. Even in the case of continuous function requirement, I get the values for sequence of times and just swap them with Failure numbers.

I need a small confirmation here.

[lfiondella]

I will need a clearer explanation in person before I can provide guidance on how to proceed.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Karthik Katipally" notifications@github.com
To: "arhik/srt.core" srt.core@noreply.github.com
Cc: "lfiondella" lfiondella@umassd.edu
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 12:12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [srt.core] Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not? (#9)

@lfiondella Can i just swap FT and FN columns for inverse of MVF. It was how i did it before. Even in the case of continuous function requirement, I get the values for sequence of times and just swap them with Failure numbers.
I need a small confirmation here.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .