Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2018. It is now read-only.

Send arcs instead of tiny line pieces for arcs and circles #148

Closed
McNugget6750 opened this issue Oct 5, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Send arcs instead of tiny line pieces for arcs and circles #148

McNugget6750 opened this issue Oct 5, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@McNugget6750
Copy link

I'm using GRBL 0.9j with a custom board but nothing special, all within GRBL specs.
I use a K40 laser, pin D11 for hardware PWM and pin D13 for inverted laser enable.

Whenever I laser a curve LW3 sends thousands of little vectors to the GRBL controller who is hopelessly underpowered to deal with this type of look-ahead. It gets worst when the radii get very small.

Currently, there is no way of setting the granularity of those vectors.
Also there is no way of using arc commands in LW3 instead of tiny line commands.

Arc commands would significantly improve cutting speed and efficiency with buffers and data communication.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 6, 2016

Pull requests gladly accepted. Look at js/threegcode.js

On Oct 6, 2016 1:26 AM, "Timo" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm using GRBL 0.9j with a custom board but nothing special, all within
GRBL specs.
I use a K40 laser, pin D11 for hardware PWM and pin D13 for inverted laser
enable.

Whenever I laser a curve LW3 sends thousands of little vectors to the GRBL
controller who is hopelessly underpowered to deal with this type of
look-ahead. It gets worst when the radii get very small.

Currently, there is no way of setting the granularity of those vectors.
Also there is no way of using arc commands in LW3 instead of tiny line
commands.

Arc commands would significantly improve cutting speed and efficiency with
buffers and data communication.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#148, or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHVr2w4bC2xRC_FFAflU1VomKZR0XLB7ks5qxDIIgaJpZM4KPZOH
.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 6, 2016

Nb note from Todd, but we can never reliably calculate offset paths as used in the CNC cam portion, from Arcs. Lines are much safer. . Investigate your Grbl Acceleration

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Oct 6, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant