Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CI/CD workflows to reduce action usage and prevent early sentry notifications #786

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

shauneccles
Copy link
Member

@shauneccles shauneccles commented Feb 23, 2024

This pull request updates the CI/CD workflows to optimize action usage and prevent early sentry notifications. The changes include:

  • Removing unnecessary paths from the CI Build LedFx workflow.

  • Adjusting the schedule for the CodeQL Analysis workflow.

  • Excluding specific paths from the Build and Test LedFx workflow.

  • Adding offline mode to the LedFx launch commands in the Run LedFx jobs.

  • Updating the Python version in the CodeQL Analysis workflow.

  • Making various improvements and optimizations to the workflows.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved CI/CD workflows by refining triggers and schedules.
    • Enhanced testing commands for better offline support.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on refining the automation and testing processes for a software project. Workflow triggers have been optimized to ignore unnecessary paths, reducing redundant checks. A scheduled trigger has been introduced for regular automated checks. The project's integration with LedFx has been enhanced by incorporating an offline mode for testing, ensuring reliability without needing an active internet connection. Additionally, the environment setup for code analysis has been updated for efficiency and better compatibility.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml - Ignored paths for PR triggers
- Added schedule trigger
- Added --offline flag for LedFx
.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml - Removed push trigger for main
- Adjusted schedule
- Updated Python version
.github/workflows/frontend-ci.yml - Added trigger for changes in .github/workflows/**
.github/workflows/.../test-build-binaries.yml - Ignored paths for push
- Added --offline flag for LedFx across various steps

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 253d8f6 and 3a8fdbf.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/ci-build.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/frontend-ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test-build-binaries.yml (6 hunks)
Additional comments: 14
.github/workflows/frontend-ci.yml (2)
  • 9-9: The addition of the .github/workflows/** path to trigger the workflow on changes within the workflows directory is a good practice. It ensures that any modifications to the CI/CD configurations are tested, enhancing the reliability of the CI system.
  • 15-15: The inclusion of the .github/workflows/** path under the pull_request trigger is consistent with the addition under the push trigger, ensuring that workflow changes are tested in both scenarios. This is a commendable practice.
.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (2)
  • 10-10: Adjusting the schedule for the CodeQL Analysis to run at 20:00 UTC daily is a thoughtful change, likely aimed at optimizing the use of GitHub Actions resources during off-peak hours.
  • 19-19: Updating the default Python version to 3.12 in the CodeQL Analysis workflow is an important step in ensuring compatibility with newer Python features and improvements. Keeping dependencies up to date is crucial for the effectiveness and security of the analysis.
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml (4)
  • 5-11: The adjustments to the workflow triggers, specifically adding paths to ignore (frontend/**, docs/**, ledfx_frontend/**), are a smart optimization. They ensure that the workflow focuses on significant changes that affect the build process, thereby optimizing the use of GitHub Actions resources.
  • 12-12: Introducing a schedule trigger to run the workflow daily at 08:00 UTC is a good practice. It ensures regular builds, which can help in catching issues in a timely manner, even in the absence of new pull requests or pushes.
  • 240-240: Modifying the command for checking LedFx launches to include an --offline flag enhances the reliability and consistency of the testing environment by reducing external dependencies. This is a valuable addition for ensuring that tests are not flaky due to issues outside the project's control.
  • 312-312: The inclusion of the --offline flag in the command for checking LedFx launches on the OS X (Apple Silicon) build is consistent with the change made for the OS X build. This ensures that the testing environment is reliable and consistent across different platforms.
.github/workflows/test-build-binaries.yml (6)
  • 4-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-10]

The addition of paths to ignore (frontend/**, docs/**, tests/**, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/**, .vscode/**) is a good optimization. It prevents unnecessary workflow runs for changes that don't affect the build or test outcomes, aligning with the PR's objective to optimize action usage.

  • 284-284: Adding the --offline flag to the LedFx launch command in the run-ledfx-windows job is a significant improvement. It ensures that the tests are run in a consistent environment by minimizing external dependencies, which is crucial for reliable CI/CD processes.
  • 306-306: Similarly, the inclusion of the --offline flag in the run-ledfx-osx job's LedFx launch command is a positive change. It enhances the reliability of the testing environment by reducing the impact of external factors, supporting the PR's goal of improving workflow efficiency.
  • 329-329: The addition of the --offline flag in the run-ledfx-osx-m1 job's LedFx launch command is consistent with the changes made in other jobs. It's a valuable adjustment for ensuring test consistency across different platforms, including Apple Silicon.
  • 472-472: Incorporating the --offline flag in the install-from-wheel job's LedFx run command is a thoughtful change. It aligns with the PR's objectives by ensuring that the tests for the PyPi wheel installation are not influenced by external dependencies.
  • 502-502: The use of the --offline flag in the install-from-sdist job's LedFx run command is consistent with the approach taken in other jobs. It's a beneficial change that supports the PR's goal of enhancing the reliability of the testing environment by minimizing external dependencies.

@shauneccles shauneccles merged commit f644ae0 into LedFx:main Feb 23, 2024
18 checks passed
@shauneccles shauneccles deleted the repo/add_ci_workflow_triggers branch February 23, 2024 02:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant