LL-8941 Conditionally auto disconnect the node-hid-singleton

[juan-cortes]

Here's the second attempt at getting a automatic release of the node-hid-singleton. After the talk we had the other day @gre I think that by exposing this method setAllowAutoDisconnect at the transport level and allowing it to override the auto-disconnect (basically re-scheduling it again) will allow us to call transport.setAllowAutoDisconnect(false) at the begining of the withDevice implementation on hw/deviceAccess from live-common and unsetting the flag on the onClose for the transport, we essentially bypass the problem we have of long running tasks inside a withDevice instance.

What do you think?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #797 (32b4a72) into master (daf99ca) will increase coverage by 0.49%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 32b4a72 differs from pull request most recent head e0189b9. Consider uploading reports for the commit e0189b9 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #797      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.09%   45.59%   +0.49%     
==========================================
  Files          83       82       -1     
  Lines        5060     5005      -55     
  Branches      897      891       -6     
==========================================
  Hits         2282     2282              
+ Misses       2576     2527      -49     
+ Partials      202      196       -6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ansport-node-hid-singleton/src/TransportNodeHid.ts

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update daf99ca...e0189b9. Read the comment docs.

[gre]

idea lgtm, some feedback

[juan-cortes]

I would like a tagged version of the node-hid-singleton package so that I can make a PR on live-common that disables auto-disconnect inside withDevice and then test it on LLD. Think we can release this to test @gre ? I'd rather not do it considering the mess I caused last time 🙈

[gre]

• can you regen doc?
• i'll soon issue a new ledgerjs bump from master, after i do can you also merge in the latest master?
• then yeah i can do a custom release (which is documented in README)

[juan-cortes]

I think this is good to merge again @gre ?