Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: The project leaders of Lemmy multi-server network, who run https://lemmy.ml as an official SUPPORTED instance, use PostgreSQL issues as a means to support China CCP or other agenda? Or some similar agenda? Ignoring issue #2910 since June 4? Baffeled as to WHY June 4 issue that takes minutes to fix was avoided? #3765

Closed
4 tasks done
RocketDerp opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 26 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@RocketDerp
Copy link
Contributor

Requirements

  • Is this a bug report? For questions or discussions use https://lemmy.ml/c/lemmy_support
  • Did you check to see if this issue already exists?
  • Is this only a single bug? Do not put multiple bugs in one issue.
  • Is this a backend issue? Use the lemmy-ui repo for UI / frontend issues.

Summary

The back-end of the back-end

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Watch GitHub since early June
  2. Watch Issue SQL Trigger/function 'person_aggregates_comment_count' is broken #2910 get ignored by project leaders

Technical Details

N/A, social agenda

Version

BE 0.17.4

Lemmy Instance URL

lemmy.ml

@RocketDerp RocketDerp added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 29, 2023
@RocketDerp RocketDerp changed the title [Bug]: The project leaders of Lemmy multi-server network, who run https://lemmy.ml as an official SUPPORTED instance, use PostgreSQL issues as a means to support China CCPD? Or some similar agenda? Ignoring issue #2910 since June4? [Bug]: The project leaders of Lemmy multi-server network, who run https://lemmy.ml as an official SUPPORTED instance, use PostgreSQL issues as a means to support China CCP or other agenda? Or some similar agenda? Ignoring issue #2910 since June4? Jul 29, 2023
@lionirdeadman
Copy link

Please stop, you don't need to do this. I'm still up for a chat if you want.

@lionirdeadman lionirdeadman closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 29, 2023
@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

Not everyone. I don't hate you. Please, we can talk.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

No, I would not do something sexual and it is not a kink. I don't want to hurt you. GitHub issues are simply not the place for this.

You've been very accusatory and it's increasingly becoming difficult to try to build a bridge if you're burning them in public. I would like to have this talk in private because I think the way you're acting in public will only cause you harm.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I don't feel comfortable sharing my identity. All I can say is I am not covering for the developers - I'm just trying to optimize GitHub issues to allow people to find issues easier.

@RocketDerp RocketDerp changed the title [Bug]: The project leaders of Lemmy multi-server network, who run https://lemmy.ml as an official SUPPORTED instance, use PostgreSQL issues as a means to support China CCP or other agenda? Or some similar agenda? Ignoring issue #2910 since June4? [Bug]: The project leaders of Lemmy multi-server network, who run https://lemmy.ml as an official SUPPORTED instance, use PostgreSQL issues as a means to support China CCP or other agenda? Or some similar agenda? Ignoring issue #2910 since June 4? Baffeled as to WHY June 4 issue that takes minutes to fix was avoided? Jul 29, 2023
@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I don't know why you're trying to insult me or why you seem hate me now. I'm just trying to help. I wish there was a way for me to get that feeling across to you.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

Well, I love many people and I focus my energy on those I love. Of course, there are people I hate. I'm sure that's true of you as well. After all, if you don't hate me, why would you insult me?

Despite these insults, I am still reaching out to you to help. I'd still like to talk with you in private and help you.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I AM BEGGING YOU, why PRIVATE? What is the advantage of private? PLEASE ANSWER, NOT RHETORICAL!

I think a chat in private is better to try to convey emotion and to talk things through. I don't feel comfortable talking about my personal life in public and I believe that's true of most people. I'd like to understand you better without making this available to everyone. I don't think it'd be a good idea to do that in public.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I think I just explained why, can you tell me what you don't understand?

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I'm sorry - I don't think I can help you if you think I'm trying to abuse you. I really wish I could help you and I wish you the best. I'm still available for a chat if you change your mind.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@lionirdeadman
Copy link

I already answered why I think a private chat would be best. I don't understand why you think I'm abusing you. I don't understand why you're trying to insult me and I don't understand why you've been this harsh with me.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

@RocketDerp

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants