Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decouple DataModules from Models - GAN #206

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Sep 12, 2020

Conversation

nateraw
Copy link
Contributor

@nateraw nateraw commented Sep 11, 2020

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure to update the docs?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

What does this PR do?

Partial fix of #207

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Sep 11, 2020

Hello @nateraw! Thanks for updating this PR.

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2020-09-11 21:08:52 UTC

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from Borda September 11, 2020 07:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #206 into master will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 82.60%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #206      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.23%   89.14%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        3298     3297       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         2943     2939       -4     
- Misses        355      358       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 89.14% <82.60%> (-0.10%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pl_bolts/models/gans/basic/basic_gan_module.py 95.50% <81.81%> (-2.25%) ⬇️
..._bolts/models/self_supervised/moco/moco2_module.py 80.15% <100.00%> (ø)
pl_bolts/datamodules/async_dataloader.py 20.00% <0.00%> (-1.22%) ⬇️
...ts/models/autoencoders/basic_ae/basic_ae_module.py 85.71% <0.00%> (-1.06%) ⬇️
pl_bolts/models/detection/faster_rcnn.py 78.84% <0.00%> (-0.79%) ⬇️
pl_bolts/datamodules/__init__.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pl_bolts/callbacks/self_supervised.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pl_bolts/models/self_supervised/byol/models.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pl_bolts/models/regression/linear_regression.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pl_bolts/models/self_supervised/ssl_finetuner.py 34.21% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 850db3d...fc52839. Read the comment docs.

@nateraw nateraw added the datamodule Anything related to datamodules label Sep 11, 2020
@williamFalcon williamFalcon merged commit 25f8b03 into Lightning-Universe:master Sep 12, 2020
@Borda Borda added this to Done in AE & GANs Nov 20, 2020
@akihironitta akihironitta mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2021
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
datamodule Anything related to datamodules
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants