Fix return type documentation of inception score #2467
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
furkan-celik
requested review from
SkafteNicki,
Borda,
justusschock and
stancld
as code owners
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2467 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 69% 38% -31%
========================================
Files 307 307
Lines 17357 17357
========================================
- Hits 11957 6647 -5310
- Misses 5400 10710 +5310 |
Borda
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2024
Borda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
* Fix return type documentation of inception score * fix too long line --------- Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte Detlefsen <skaftenicki@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Fixes some typo on the documentation of InceptionScore. Return type mentioned on the documentation is wrong and misleading in it's current state.
Before submitting
PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.
Did you have fun?
Make sure you had fun coding 馃檭
馃摎 Documentation preview 馃摎: https://torchmetrics--2467.org.readthedocs.build/en/2467/