Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

note 6 : is curvelet a good setting for pqn #31

Open
LinaMiao opened this issue Nov 6, 2012 · 0 comments
Open

note 6 : is curvelet a good setting for pqn #31

LinaMiao opened this issue Nov 6, 2012 · 0 comments

Comments

@LinaMiao
Copy link
Owner

LinaMiao commented Nov 6, 2012

Since high dimension(bigger than one) curelet are redundant,

say one example I have been used in curve let case,

whos x_spg
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes

x_spg 529339x1 4234712 double

whos A
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes

A 145408x529339 210093 opFoG

whos RM
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes

RM 145408x182272 206777 opKron

whos D
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes

D 182272x1 1458176 double

Which means I have to store several vectors of the length 529339,

Well if I'm not using a redundant dictionary, say DFT,

F = 182272 _182272
A = 145408_182272
x = 182272*1

But, this makes the matrix small, which result in a cheaper mat-vec multiplication,

So, where is the balance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant