Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Mark-sweep error upon initial stage #297

Closed
4 tasks done
FahdiiiG opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

[BUG] Mark-sweep error upon initial stage #297

FahdiiiG opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending 🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working

Comments

@FahdiiiG
Copy link

FahdiiiG commented Oct 25, 2021

Environment

Self-Hosted (Docker)

Version

Latest (arm32v7 tag)

Describe the problem

Running dashy in docker on an RPi 3b+.
Getting the following error upon glancing at the logs.
IMGUR

Any ideas guys?

Running via Stack in Portainer with the following syntax:

version: '3.3'
services:
    dashy:
        container_name: dashy
        restart: always
        privileged: true
        ports:
            - '4000:80'
        volumes:
            - '/home/pi/Docker/dashy/conf.yml:/app/public/conf.yml'
        image: 'lissy93/dashy:arm32v7'

Also tried via the command
docker run -d --name dashy --restart=always --privileged -p 4000:80 -v ~/Docker/dashy/conf.yml:/app/public/conf.yml lissy93/dashy:arm32v7

Additional info

This error occurs upon initial start and keeps looping back if the container isn't stopped.

Please tick the boxes

@FahdiiiG FahdiiiG added the 🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working label Oct 25, 2021
@liss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Welcome to Dashy 👋
It's great to have you here, but unfortunately your ticket has been closed to prevent spam. Before reopening this issue, please ensure the following criteria are met.

Issues are sometimes closed when users:

  • Have only recently joined GitHub
  • Have not yet stared this repository
  • Have not previously interacted with the repo

Before you reopen this issue, please also ensure that:

  • You have checked that a similar issue does not already exist
  • You have checked the documentation for an existing solution
  • You have completed the relevant sections in the Issue template

Once you have verified the above standards are met, you may reopen this issue. Sorry for any inconvenience caused, I'm just a bot, and sometimes make mistakes 🤖

@Lissy93
Copy link
Owner

Lissy93 commented Oct 25, 2021

Hmm looks like not enough memory. There is a spike in memory usage when the container first starts, and the app builds for the first time, but it shouldn't be enough to prevent it running on a Pi (I've run it on a Pi 3 no problems) 🤔

@FahdiiiG FahdiiiG changed the title [BUG] [BUG] Mark-sweep error upon initial stage Oct 25, 2021
@FahdiiiG
Copy link
Author

Hmm looks like not enough memory. There is a spike in memory usage when the container first starts, and the app builds for the first time, but it shouldn't be enough to prevent it running on a Pi (I've run it on a Pi 3 no problems) 🤔

I even tried the --privileged route, just in case.

@liss-bot liss-bot added the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label Oct 25, 2021
@Lissy93
Copy link
Owner

Lissy93 commented Oct 25, 2021

Yeah, you don't need to run with privilages, and it's best not to
I'll have another look into it, but also am working on a Lite version, whch will be much lighter-weight, and have no probelm on low-powerd SBCs. If I can't find a solution to this one, I'll update you when the lite version is out, as that will easily run on your system :)

@liss-bot liss-bot removed the 👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending label Oct 25, 2021
@FahdiiiG
Copy link
Author

Yeah, you don't need to run with privilages, and it's best not to I'll have another look into it, but also am working on a Lite version, whch will be much lighter-weight, and have no probelm on low-powerd SBCs. If I can't find a solution to this one, I'll update you when the lite version is out, as that will easily run on your system :)

Glad to hear that. I'll be waiting then. :D

For reference purposes, here are the stats after rebooting the pi (3 apps, 4 containers. Portainer, nginx proxy manager and rtorrent_rutorrent) and letting it run for a few (~10ish) minutes.
Load Average
Memory
Swap

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
👤 Awaiting Maintainer Response [ISSUE] Response from repo author is pending 🐛 Bug [ISSUE] Ticket describing something that isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants