Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
If I use certain behaviors constantly, I prefer two stroke. If I use it somewhat often, I use three strokes. Anything less often than that I'll just use a command. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yeah, I was a long-time Spacevim user as well. The keys that I miss the most are the The other thing that I miss is documentation. Seems like very few of the Lua plugins have nice help tags like the viml plugins in SVIM. That definitely makes changing things much harder. It seems like people document the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi there,
I've used SpaceVim for a long time, but now I'm using LunarVim to take advantage of the new features introduced in neovim 0.5.
After switching one thing I'm missing are some useful
<space>
keybindings. Most of them are made by three keystrokes (space
+letter1
+letter2
).Instead I've noticed that most of LunarVim keybindings are made by two keystrokes (except for +LSP, +git and something else).
I'm wondering if this is related to typing speed: two-strokes keybindings are faster to type, but with three-strokes keybindings more things can be mapped.
Here only few examples from SpaceVim that I find useful:
<space>ff
→ find file (currently<space>f
)<space>fs
→ save file (currently<space>w
)<space>ws
→ split window horizontally<space>wv
→ split window vertically<space>tb
→ toggle background color (from light to dark and vice-versa)<space>ts
→ toggle spell checking<space>xw
→ remove trailing whitespacesI know I can create my own keybindings in
config.lua
(and I've already done it), but I think that using three-strokes keybindings could be advantageous for some (or many) users.So I'm asking you what's your opinion about this, and what keybindings style (two or three keystrokes) do you prefer.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions