Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

toBePointGeometry #9

Closed
M-Scott-Lassiter opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

toBePointGeometry #9

M-Scott-Lassiter opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@M-Scott-Lassiter
Copy link
Owner

M-Scott-Lassiter commented May 24, 2022

Description

This is a building block matcher. Geometries are the basis of all objects, and we need a way to reliably test that they have been formatted appropriately.

This matcher focuses only on "Point". All coordinates must be valid coordinates per the WGS-84 standard. Any non-conforming values should fail. However, the "coordinates" property MAY have an empty array ([ ]) as a valid value.

A Geometry object represents points, curves, and surfaces in coordinate space. Every Geometry object is a GeoJSON object no matter where it occurs in a GeoJSON text.

  • The value of a Geometry object's "type" member MUST be one of the seven geometry types (per Section 1.4: "Point", "MultiPoint", "LineString", "MultiLineString", "Polygon", "MultiPolygon", and "GeometryCollection").
  • A GeoJSON Geometry object of any type other than "GeometryCollection" has a member with the name "coordinates". The value of the "coordinates" member is an array. The structure of the elements in this array is determined by the type of geometry. GeoJSON processors MAY interpret Geometry objects with empty "coordinates" arrays as null objects.

~https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-3.1

For type "Point", the "coordinates" member is a single position.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-3.1.2

The geometry object should have a "type" and a "coordinates" property. It is prohibited from having a "geometry", "properties", or "features" property.

Implementations MUST NOT change the semantics of GeoJSON members and types.

The GeoJSON "coordinates" and "geometries" members define Geometry objects. FeatureCollection and Feature objects, respectively, MUST NOT contain a "coordinates" or "geometries" member.

The GeoJSON "geometry" and "properties" members define a Feature object. FeatureCollection and Geometry objects, respectively, MUST NOT contain a "geometry" or "properties" member.

The GeoJSON "features" member defines a FeatureCollection object. Feature and Geometry objects, respectively, MUST NOT contain a "features" member.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-7.1

Although illogical, it is NOT PROHIBITED from having a "geometries" property, although if present it would be considered a foreign member.

Other foreign members ARE allowed (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-6.1). None of these foreign members should get checked for validity of any type; they may contain anything that is valid JSON.

See GeoJSON Spec: What does it mean to extend GeoJSON without using a foreign member? for further clarification.

Bounding boxes, if present, must validate (see isValidBoundingBox).

A GeoJSON object represents a Geometry, Feature, or collection of Features.

~ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-3

A GeoJSON object MAY have a member named "bbox" to include information on the coordinate range for its Geometries, Features, or FeatureCollections.

~ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-5

Valid GeoJSON Point Geometry Examples

A two dimensional of point:

{
    "type": "Point",
    "coordinates": [100.0, 0.0]
}

A three dimensional of point:

{
    "type": "Point",
    "coordinates": [100.0, 0.0, 2000]
}

An empty coordinate

{
    "type": "Point",
    "coordinates": [ ]
}

Contained as an object within a geometries array on a GeometryCollection:

{
    "type": "GeometryCollection",
    "geometries": [{
        "type": "Point",
        "coordinates": [100.0, 0.0]
    }, {
        "type": "LineString",
        "coordinates": [
            [101.0, 0.0],
            [102.0, 1.0]
        ]
    }]
}

In each case, the matcher should only get passed the object in its entirety, not the individual components, and not as part of another collection object.

Example Matcher Usage

const point1 = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [100.0, 0.0]
}
const point2 = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [100.0, 0.0, 2000]
}
const point3 = {
    type: "LineString",
    coordinates: [
        [101.0, 0.0],
        [102.0, 1.0]
    ]
}

expect(point1).toBePointGeometry()
expect(point2).toBePointGeometry()

expect(point3).not.toBePointGeometry()
expect([22, -34.549, 22]).not.toBePointGeometry()
expect({coordinates: [100.0, 0.0]}).not.toBePointGeometry()

Passing Tests

This matcher does not test coordinate validity. Either two or three digit coordinates are allowed.

Values in Range

  • 2D Point
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [25, 10.2]
}
  • 3D Point
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [-100.0, -15.0, 2000]
}
  • Empty Coordinate
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [ ]
}

Foreign Properties Allowed

  • ID (String and number input: Test 1, 1
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    id: <input>,
    coordinates: [25, 90]
}
  • Non alphanumeric ID
    ID Normally needs to be a letter or number, but because it is a foreign member on a geometry object, the GeoJSON standard takes no consideration about it.
const testPoint1 = {
    type: "Point",
    id: null,
    coordinates: [25, 90]
}
  • Geometries
const testPoint2 = {
    type: "Point",
    geometries: testPoint1,
    coordinates: [-100.0, -15.0, 2000]
}
  • Multiple
const testPoint3 = {
    type: "Point",
    someRandomProp: true,
    geometries: testPoint2,
    coordinates: [180, 10.2, -125]
}

May Have Optional Bounding Box

  • Logical
    • 2D: [-10.0, -10.0, 10.0, 10.0]
    • 3D: [-10.0, -10.0, 0, 10.0, 10.0, 200]
const testPoint = {
    type: 'Point',
    coordinates: [0, 0],
    bbox: <input>
}
  • Illogical
const testPoint = {
    type: 'Point',
    bbox: [-30.0, -30.0, -20.0, -20.0],
    coordinates: [0, 0]
}
  • Redundant
const testPoint = {
    type: 'Point',
    bbox: [0, 0, 0, 0],
    coordinates: [0, 0]
}

Failing Tests

Geometry Input Not an Object

Any of the following inputs to the matcher should fail:

  • undefined
  • null
  • Booleans: true, false
  • Numbers: 200, -200, Infinity, -Infinity, NaN
  • Arrays: [{ coordinates: [0, 0] }]
  • Strings: '', 'Random Geometry', '[0, 0]', '[[0, 0], [0, 0]]'
  • Stringified JSON:
    JSON.stringify({
        type: "Point",
        coordinates: [25, 90]
    })

Invalid Coordinates

  • Each of the values from "Geometry Input Not an Object":
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: <input>
}

Coordinates Out of Range

This only tests a handful of invalid coordinates to verify behavior. Detailed coordinate validation occurs in isValidCoordinate

Input: [181, 91], [181, -91], [-181, 91, 0], [-181, -91, 200], [0, 0, 0, 0]

const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: <input>
}

Type Value Incorrect

Input:

  • Each of the values from "Geometry Input Not an Object", plus
  • 'MultiPoint', 'LineString', 'MultiLineString', 'Polygon', 'MultiPolygon', and 'GeometryCollection', or
  • 'POINT', 'point'
const testPoint = {
    type: <input>,
    coordinates: [0, 0]
}

Contains Prohibited Properties

Geometry

const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [0, 0],
    geometry: {
        type: "Point",
        coordinates: [102.0, 0.5]
    }
}

Properties

const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [0, 0],
    properties: {
        prop1: true
    }
}

Features

const testPoint = {
    type: "Point",
    coordinates: [0, 0],
    features: [{
        type: "Feature",
        geometry: {
            type: "Point",
            coordinates: [102.0, 0.5]
            },
        properties: {
           prop0: "value0"
        }
    }]
}

Missing Required Properties

  • No Type
const testPoint = {
    coordinates: [0, 0]
}
  • No Coordinates
const testPoint = {
    type: "Point"
}

Invalid Bounding Box

  • null
  • undefined
  • []
  • Missing Element: [-10.0, -10.0, 10.0]
  • Out of Range Element: [-10.0, -10.0, 190.0, 10.0]
  • South Greater than North: [-10.0, 10.0, 10.0, -10]
  • Bad altitude: [-10.0, -10.0, 0, 10, 10.0, '200']
const testPoint = {
    type: 'Point',
    coordinates: [0, 0],
    bbox: <input>
}
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter added the new matcher proposal Proposal for a new GeoJSON matcher label May 24, 2022
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter self-assigned this May 24, 2022
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter added this to To do in Geometries via automation May 24, 2022
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter changed the title [New Matcher]: toBePointGeometry toBePointGeometry May 24, 2022
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter moved this from To do to In progress in Geometries May 25, 2022
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter moved this from In progress to To do in Geometries May 26, 2022
M-Scott-Lassiter added a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2022
Verifies an object is a valid GeoJSON Point Geometry.
Creates a new category for geometries in
core, matchers, and tests.
New setup script added, included in package.json entry points.
Type
definitions overhauled to group matchers and core separately in documentation.
Added function to
Commitizen config.
Updates the error descriptions thrown from coordinate validation core functions
to be more descriptive of where they came from. 'Input' was too vague when called from the geometry
matcher as opposed to the coordinate matcher. This updated the snapshots as well.

Resolves: #9
@M-Scott-Lassiter M-Scott-Lassiter moved this from To do to Done in Geometries May 26, 2022
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2022
## [1.0.0-beta.6](v1.0.0-beta.5...v1.0.0-beta.6) (2022-05-26)

### 🎁 Feature Changes

* **toBePointGeometry:** add new matcher ([9973afa](9973afa)), closes [#9](#9)
@M-Scott-Lassiter
Copy link
Owner Author

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.0-beta.6 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@M-Scott-Lassiter
Copy link
Owner Author

M-Scott-Lassiter commented May 31, 2022

Reopening to add coverage to validate optional bounding boxes.

Geometries automation moved this from Done to In progress May 31, 2022
M-Scott-Lassiter added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
…d matchers

The spec for [bounding boxes](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-5) permits
GeoJSON objects to have bounding boxes. Section 3 of the spec states "A GeoJSON object represents a
Geometry, Feature, or collection of Features." Therefore, the geometry objects should all have
allowed bounding boxes. Thus, they all need to check that if that property is present that it is in
fact a valid 2D or 3D bbox.

Resolves: #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #16, #29
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
## [1.0.0-beta.14](v1.0.0-beta.13...v1.0.0-beta.14) (2022-06-01)

### 🐞 Bug Fixes

* add bounding box validity checking to geometry core functions and matchers ([ac6a9a1](ac6a9a1)), closes [/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-5](https://github.com/M-Scott-Lassiter//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946/issues/section-5) [#9](#9) [#10](#10) [#11](#11) [#12](#12) [#13](#13) [#14](#14) [#16](#16) [#29](#29)
@M-Scott-Lassiter
Copy link
Owner Author

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.0-beta.14 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Geometries automation moved this from In progress to Done Jun 1, 2022
This was referenced Jun 1, 2022
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2022
## 1.0.0 (2022-06-02)

### 🧭 API Documentation Changes

* **toBeMultiLineStringGeometry:** add the min point count error to the JSDoc API ([01f6c4b](01f6c4b))
* change JSDoc param types to avoid using GeoJSON unknown types ([06ac03a](06ac03a))
* **all:** cleanup JSDoc formatting and standardize API examples ([300a96d](300a96d))
* update JSDoc descriptions of coordinate core functions ([f5658f3](f5658f3))
* update JSDoc organization ([7ab7eca](7ab7eca))
* **isValidCoordinate:** update returns description ([70bd43e](70bd43e))
* **isValidCoordinate:** update the error and parameter descriptions ([7e3e8ed](7e3e8ed))

### 🐞 Bug Fixes

* add bounding box validity checking to geometry core functions and matchers ([ac6a9a1](ac6a9a1)), closes [/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-5](https://github.com/M-Scott-Lassiter//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946/issues/section-5) [#9](#9) [#10](#10) [#11](#11) [#12](#12) [#13](#13) [#14](#14) [#16](#16) [#29](#29)
* **toBeLineStringGeometry:** prohibit single coordinate in "coordinates" member ([ee5de52](ee5de52)), closes [/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-3](https://github.com/M-Scott-Lassiter//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946/issues/section-3) [#11](#11)

### 🎯 Test Changes

* add 'Feature' and 'FeatureCollection' to test list of disallowed geometry type values ([f139a09](f139a09))
* **toBeLineStringGeometry:** add a stress test with many points ([22df5c7](22df5c7))
* **toBeGeometryCollection:** add an unrecognizable geometry to the invalid tests ([5c041c6](5c041c6))
* **toBeGeometryCollection:** add robust snapshot tests, verify coordinates treated as foreign member ([472d12d](472d12d)), closes [#32](#32) [#33](#33)
* **isValid2DBoundingBox:** add robust snapshot tests ([4363710](4363710)), closes [#32](#32)
* **isValid2DCoordinate:** add robust snapshot tests ([ae92f67](ae92f67)), closes [#32](#32)
* **isValid3DBoundingBox:** add robust snapshot tests ([a37ec48](a37ec48)), closes [#32](#32)
* **isValid3DCoordinate:** add robust snapshot tests ([56fbf92](56fbf92)), closes [#32](#32)
* **isValidBoundingBox:** add robust snapshot tests ([063b94e](063b94e)), closes [#32](#32)
* **isValidCoordinate:** add robust snapshot tests ([7b4a804](7b4a804)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeAnyGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([8a6e611](8a6e611)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeLineStringGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([cfaed46](cfaed46)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeMultiLineStringGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([57dc767](57dc767)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeMultiPointGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([36013e1](36013e1)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeMultiPolygonGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([df1c23a](df1c23a)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBePointGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([fd5c516](fd5c516)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBePolygonGeometry:** add robust snapshot tests ([1c9df69](1c9df69)), closes [#32](#32)
* **toBeMultiLineStringGeometry:** fix coordinate out of range test that ([d6fe2ac](d6fe2ac))
* **toBeMultiPointGeometry:** fix typo in test and core function that was omitting coverage ([bc10f4e](bc10f4e))
* **isValid2DBoundingBox:** fix typo in test descriptions ([df94c27](df94c27))
* setup the project testing framework ([6a95c37](6a95c37))

### 🎁 Feature Changes

* **isValid2DBoundingBox:** add new matcher function ([7fe56f3](7fe56f3)), closes [#6](#6)
* **isValid2DCoordinate:** add new matcher function ([527bbc4](527bbc4)), closes [#1](#1)
* **isValid3DCoordinate:** add new matcher function ([0329231](0329231)), closes [#2](#2)
* **isValidCoordinate:** add new matcher function ([d7e5b70](d7e5b70)), closes [#4](#4)
* **isValid3DBoundingBox:** add new matcher ([6ee8cc6](6ee8cc6)), closes [#7](#7)
* **isValidBoundingBox:** add new matcher ([9a8b7ed](9a8b7ed)), closes [#8](#8)
* **toBeAnyGeometry:** add new matcher ([ed7c3eb](ed7c3eb)), closes [#15](#15)
* **toBeFeature:** add new matcher ([551aa7f](551aa7f)), closes [#32](#32) [#24](#24)
* **toBeFeatureCollection:** add new matcher ([21fe044](21fe044)), closes [#25](#25)
* **toBeGeometryCollection:** add new matcher ([63cc919](63cc919)), closes [#16](#16)
* **toBeLineStringGeometry:** add new matcher ([54416a5](54416a5)), closes [#11](#11)
* **toBeMultiLineStringGeometry:** add new matcher ([3d3a15e](3d3a15e)), closes [#12](#12)
* **toBeMultiPointGeometry:** add new matcher ([9a12752](9a12752)), closes [#10](#10)
* **toBeMultiPolygonGeometry:** add new matcher ([41fef3a](41fef3a)), closes [#14](#14)
* **toBePointGeometry:** add new matcher ([9973afa](9973afa)), closes [#9](#9)
* **toBePolygonGeometry:** add new matcher ([3b9d18d](3b9d18d)), closes [#13](#13)
* split package exports into matcher and core functionality ([a7340d9](a7340d9)), closes [#5](#5)

### 🏗️ Build Changes

* add conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits as dev dependency ([7361d79](7361d79)), closes [#3](#3)
* **package:** add entry points for all, boundingboxes, and coordinates ([8c1d312](8c1d312))
* move release configuration into a separate shareable file ([fa6e50d](fa6e50d))
* **package:** rename matcher loader entry script ([5221d6d](5221d6d))
* setup initial project environment ([b468a41](b468a41))
* **package:** update the commitizen config for customized scopes ([ac05626](ac05626))
* **devDependencies:** upgrade Jest to v28.1, specify peerDependency at >v24.0.0 ([22d1614](22d1614)), closes [#30](#30)
* **package:** upgrade min required Node version to 16 ([58a9824](58a9824))
* **package:** upgrade minimum required node version from 10 to 14 to match LTS schedule ([1e8a8bb](1e8a8bb))
@M-Scott-Lassiter
Copy link
Owner Author

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Geometries
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant