Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Publish es module for tree shaking #13

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2018
Merged

Publish es module for tree shaking #13

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2018

Conversation

fdubost
Copy link
Member

@fdubost fdubost commented Oct 26, 2018 •
edited

Because we don't want a duplicate lodash dependency in our bundle 😄

Publish es module for tree shaking
e244257 
Because we want a duplicate lodash dependency in our bundle 😄
@fdubost fdubost closed this Oct 29, 2018
@fdubost fdubost reopened this Oct 29, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 23

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.308%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 56
Relevant Lines: 60
💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 77

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.308%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 56
Relevant Lines: 60
💛 - Coveralls

@flepretre flepretre merged commit 069aee8 into master Oct 29, 2018
@flepretre flepretre deleted the publish-es branch October 29, 2018 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@oltodo oltodo oltodo approved these changes

@flepretre flepretre flepretre approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@fdubost @coveralls @oltodo @flepretre