-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Worse performance than FGT on custom video #76
Comments
I’m seeing the same result with my own videos, were you able to resolve this issue? |
No, I just use FGT |
So you were able to get the desired inpainting results using FGT? |
Yep FGT worked best for me but you have to decrease the resolution. Otherwise you'll get OOM. 360p resolution videos worked best for me |
Thanks I’ll give it a try! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi. I ran the HQ model and I keep getting worse performance than the other inpainting models that E2FGVI is supposed to be better than.
E2FGVI for some reason just blurs my masked portion (it does not actually inpaint it). So I just get the same video but with the object being very blurry. Is there any way to remedy this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: