Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Opting in ci-helpers for travis testing #1284

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2017

Conversation

bsipocz
Copy link
Contributor

@bsipocz bsipocz commented Apr 5, 2017

This gets green lights when testing on my fork, I'm not totally sure why the last statement didn't cause problems before ci-helpers.

Also there may be some other parts where ci-helpers could be used, but overall it won't be much simpler (e.g. we usually cut our test cmd into two part, MAIN_CMD and SETUP_CMD, and when the latter starts with build_sphinx, it will recognize it and installs sphinx).

Also I can add pylint to the list of linters we support.

.travis.yml Outdated
test ${TRAVIS_BRANCH} == ${GH_DOC_BRANCH} && \
test "${BUILD_DOCS}" == "true"; then
bash ${TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR}/maintainer/deploy_docs.sh
if
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: fi to close the if-block.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I've fixed that already a couple of hours ago, but apparently pushed to the wrong branch...

@mnmelo
Copy link
Member

mnmelo commented Apr 5, 2017

Hmmm... the travis builds weren't triggered?

@bsipocz
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsipocz commented Apr 5, 2017

@mnmelo - They have some issues with their database, maybe that's causing this, too. This is the run on my fork with the same commit: https://travis-ci.org/bsipocz/mdanalysis/builds/218986875

@bsipocz
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsipocz commented Apr 5, 2017

(closing and reopening to try to trigger travis)

@bsipocz bsipocz closed this Apr 5, 2017
@bsipocz bsipocz reopened this Apr 5, 2017
@mnmelo
Copy link
Member

mnmelo commented Apr 5, 2017

Yup, that did it.

@mnmelo
Copy link
Member

mnmelo commented Apr 6, 2017

@kain88-de, could you please have a look and approve? This is much more your thing...

@kain88-de kain88-de merged commit 4f79483 into MDAnalysis:develop Apr 6, 2017
@kain88-de
Copy link
Member

@bsipocz Thanks for the help

@mnmelo
Copy link
Member

mnmelo commented Apr 6, 2017

Thanks for yours, too, @kain88-de.

@kain88-de kain88-de mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2017
2 tasks
orbeckst added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2023
Update of AUTHORS and CHANGELOG with inferred author contributions.

*  Removed duplicate mattwthompson in 0.20.0 changelog entry.: mattwthompson was placed twice by accident, this removes this duplication.

* Addition of missing authors.

   An retrospective analysis of the authors found via `git shortlog -s -n --email --branches="develop"` found several commits by authors which were not present in the `AUTHORS.md` file.

    - Zhenbo Li: commited via PR: Started tests for gnm. #803 and Make Travis run tests on OSX. #771,
    - Jenna M. Swarthout via PR Update CoC according to suggestions from current CoC committee #4289 and Point to new reporting form link (owned by conduct@mdanalysis.org) #4298,
    - Bradley Dice via PR   Fix GSD Windows compatibility #2384 ,
    - David Minh via PR #2668

   There seemed to be no indications in the above mentioned PRs that the author did not want to be in the authors file, it looks like it was just forgotten.

* Addition of missing entries from the changelog

   Continued cross referencing of the git shortlog output but also accounting for the changelog identified several individuals that had not been included in the changelog entries for the release they contributed under. They were added to the relevant entry of the changelog based on the merge commit date.

   Please note that for Tone Bengsten, we a) had no github handle (so they were assigned @tbengtsen), and b) no specific commit. Given we know that this individual was including alongside the encore merge, they were assigned to the 0.16.0 release.

* Update CHANGELOG
* PR #1218
* PR #1284 and #1408
* PR #4109
* based on git history
* PRs #803 and #771 (author addition, changelog addition)
* PR #2255 and #2221
* PR #1225
* PR #4289 and #4298
* PR #4031
* PR #4085
* PR #3635
* PR #2356
* PR #2559
* No GH handle - Encore author addition @tbengtsen
* PR #4184
* PR #2614
* PR #2219
* PR #2384
* PR #2668
* Add missing entry for Jenna

Thanks to @fiona-naughton for helping out with digging into this data :)

Co-authored-by: Fiona Naughton <fiona@mdanalysis.org>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Beckstein <orbeckst@mdanalysis.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants