Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change name in the startup display of the stable ROM #22

Closed
lydon42 opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Change name in the startup display of the stable ROM #22

lydon42 opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lydon42
Copy link
Member

lydon42 commented Aug 21, 2022

We want to change the displayed name from
THE MEGA65 DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
to something else, so it becomes clearer that this is the stable ROM.

Also the copyright notice needs to be changed to 2022.

Current contenders are:
THE MEGA65 PERSONAL COMPUTER SYSTEM (like C64C)
THE MEGA65 MICRO COMPUTER SYSTEM
THE MEGA65 HOME COMPUTER SYSTEM

@lydon42 lydon42 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 21, 2022
@lydon42 lydon42 self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@lydon42 lydon42 added this to the MEGA65 Release 0.95 (Batch 2) milestone Aug 21, 2022
@oe4dns
Copy link

oe4dns commented Aug 22, 2022

THE MEGA65 HOME COMPUTER SYSTEM - sounds great :)

@dansanderson
Copy link
Collaborator

Steering Committee decision: "THE MEGA65 PERSONAL COMPUTER SYSTEM"

diff --git a/b65.src b/b65.src
index ccc37ee..8c9774e 100644
--- a/b65.src
+++ b/b65.src
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ signon_message
    .byte code_clr
    .byte code_rvs,code_red,'                     ',code_rof,code_tri,code_cr
    .byte code_rvs,code_ora,'                  ',code_rof,code_tri
-   .byte code_def,code_tab,'     THE MEGA65 DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM',code_cr
+   .byte code_def,code_tab,'  THE MEGA65 PERSONAL COMPUTER SYSTEM',code_cr
    .byte code_rvs,code_yel,'               ',code_rof,code_tri,code_cr
    .byte code_rvs,code_grn,'            ',code_rof,code_tri
    .byte code_def,code_tab,'     (C) 2021 MEGA, 1991 COMMODORE, 1977 MICROSOFT',code_cr

mega65-screen-000032

@lgblgblgb
Copy link
Collaborator

Btw, 2021 MEGA shouldn't be modified to 2022 MEGA since a while already? At least I assume the year is the one when it was released? Or hmm I am not sure how it should be interpreted, clearly FROM-TO year is more clear but overkill here, so I would assume this way at least.

@dansanderson
Copy link
Collaborator

dansanderson commented Sep 10, 2022

When a work contains material published across multiple years, you can either use the earliest date (2021) or a date range (2021-2022) in the copyright notice. Using only the latest date can cause confusion if a copyright is challenged or an infringement claim must be asserted. In most countries, a work is copyright the moment it is created, though typically the date of first publication is used in the notice. The notice is there to inform others of how copyright law applies to the work (e.g. duration of the copyright), and to demonstrate that an infringer was informed of the assertion of copyright.

https://www.copyrightlaws.com/copyright-symbol-notice-year/ :

The general rule is that the year to include in a copyright notice is the year of first publication of the work. First publication is when the work is made available to the public without restriction. This includes selling a book or leaving free copies of it in a public place or posting content on your blog. Publication does not include, for example, circulating copies internally to co-workers or sending copies of a book to a publisher.

For compilations or derivative works which incorporate previously published content, the year of first publication of the compilation or derivative work is sufficient.

It's possible the license of the original Commodore ROM may specify additional terms that apply to the copyright notice. I'm not familiar with the license text. For all I know the additional mentions of Commodore and Microsoft are there just as a courtesy or tribute.

@lgblgblgb
Copy link
Collaborator

Aha, thanks, it's new for me, I always thought that the latest modification is the significant, especially if it's throughout years of development, "surely" not the 10-20 years ago is what you want to show. But hey, it seems I was wrong.

@dansanderson
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been implemented in 920377.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants