Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STIX file does not lost Marking infos #30

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

davidonzo
Copy link
Contributor

Removing Marking elements result just in a loss of data.
No problem or bug detected commenting the lines above.

Tested for months in a production environment using this MISP TAXII HOOK.

Removing Marking elements result just in a loss of data.
No problem or bug detected commenting the lines above. 

Tested for months in a production environment using this [MISP TAXII HOOK](https://github.com/davidonzo/MISP-Taxii-Server/blob/master/misp_taxii_hooks/hooks.py).
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 26, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 46.2% when pulling ffc296f on davidonzo:master into 53a8ec2 on MISP:master.

@davidonzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated the MISP TAXII HOOK with and improved version, ables to catch handling elements pushing them in a MISP event as tags elements.

Tested both with STIX 1.1.1 and STIX 1.2.

@davidonzo davidonzo closed this Mar 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants