Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Benchmarking Results for Cinder and CPython #6

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: cinder/3.10
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MAMV3x3
Copy link
Collaborator

@MAMV3x3 MAMV3x3 commented Oct 12, 2023

Overview

This PR introduces the benchmarking results for both Cinder and CPython. These results provide insight into the performance characteristics of both systems, which can guide further optimizations and decision-making.

Changes

  • Added cinder_results.json inside the benchmarks folder.
  • Added cpython_results.json inside the benchmarks folder.

Implications

Having these results in the repository:

  • Offers a baseline for performance comparisons in future modifications.
  • Provides insights to developers and stakeholders on the current performance characteristics of Cinder and CPython.

I would appreciate a thorough review, especially regarding the correctness and clarity of the data presented. Feedback on the structure of the results or any additional metrics of interest is also welcomed.

Thank you!

@MAMV3x3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

MAMV3x3 commented Oct 12, 2023

Introduced a detailed comparison between the performance results of CPython and Cinder.

Method

I used the following command to generate the comparison:
pyperformance compare result_cpython.json result_cinder.json > benchmark_comparison_cpython_vs_cinder.txt

The resulting file, benchmark_comparison_cpython_vs_cinder.txt, provides a side-by-side comparison of the performance metrics of both platforms.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant