provide wheel for python3.9

[dvzrv]

Would it be possible to add wheels for python3.9 with a new patch release? :)
Currently it is only possible to compile the package on the fly in a virtualized environment on python3.9.

[asfaltboy]

@fantix @elprans could/should we port the Github Actions CI build script from MagicStack/uvloop into httptools to support 3.9? Or maybe even use joerick/cibuildwheel Or is there another requirement to support 3.9?

[b0g3r]

It would be very useful to have wheels for httptools on 3.9. A big part of python's async framework ecosystems (e.g. uvicorn, popular asgi server) depends on httptools. It means, that for installing uvicorn[standard] to docker3.9 we need not only python, but also python-dev for building. It's increases the build-time and weight of a resulting image.

I could be wrong, but it looks like all it needed is append 3.9 to the build and test matrix.

[cmacht]

I'm trying to install uvicorn for fastapi on shared hosting where I cannot fix the missing dependency myself. So very much looking forward to seeing the accepted PR in a release soon.

[pauloxnet]

Thanks for your work on this package.

Can you please release a wheel for Python 3.9 ?

[pauloxnet]

@fantix thanks for the 0.2.0 release.

Unfortunately the original request of this issue was a wheel package for the 0.1.1 version of httptools for python 3.9 because, as @b0g3r wrote above, uvicorn[standard] require httptools==0.1.*

After the 0.2.0 release nothing has changed for people that are using uvicorn with python3.9.

Can you please add a python3.9 compatible wheel for httptools==0.1.1 ?

Thanks in advance for your work here 🙏

[fantix]

@pauloxnet oh sure thing! I think I could backport the 3.9 fix together with 9340d32, and release 0.1.2. Sounds like a plan?

[fantix]

Fixed in #66, please feel free to let me know if there're more issues.

[pauloxnet]

Yes, thanks it worked.

[cmacht]

Works here as well. Wonderful! Thanks for acting so fast! 🌟