This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add ability to execute XML-RPC calls other than "Bug.xxx" #45
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| @@ -175,15 +175,14 @@ def clone(bug_id, overrides = {}) | |||
| end | |||
|
|
|||
| # Bypass python-bugzilla and use the xmlrpc API directly. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you remove this comment, while we're at it? It really doesn't apply anymore.
|
Checked commits xtagon@50e9de8 .. xtagon@e5ab55a with rubocop 0.21.0 |
chessbyte
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2014
Add ability to execute XML-RPC calls other than "Bug.xxx"
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now you can execute arbitrary API methods instead of only ones on the Bug namespace.
I also added a convenience method on the main module, so that if
Base.serviceis set, we can do stuff like:or, equivalently...
See issue #44