Fix for Quota validation issue with service dialog memory values.

[billfitzgerald0120]

Modified requested method for the following 2 issues:

1. vm_memory value in service dialog was NOT being used for Quota requested.
2. option_0_vm_memory value in service dialog was being used without the megabytes so 8192 would only be 8KB not 8GIG.

With this fix, if you use option_0_vm_memory or vm_memory in a service dialog and request 8192, it will be 8 GIG requested in Quota.

fixes:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775211
@miq-bot add_label bug
@miq-bot assign @tinaafitz

[miq-bot]

Checked commit billfitzgerald0120@fcb47cd with ruby 2.5.5, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 👍

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4025

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 97.266%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 4022:	0.01%
Covered Lines:	3024
Relevant Lines:	3109

---

💛 - Coveralls

[billfitzgerald0120]

@miq-bot add_label hammer/no, ivanchuk/no, changelog/yes

[simaishi]

@billfitzgerald0120 @tinaafitz The BZ is targeted for 5.10.z, but this PR is marked as ivanchuk/no and hammer/no. Do you need to create a different PR for ivanchuk/hammer?

[tinaafitz]

Hi @simaishi @dmetzger57 and I discussed the issue this morning. We're not going to change 5.10. I'm waiting to hear back from Josh to see if we should change 5.11.

We're going to create a talk topic that will include instructions for customers to manually apply the code changes in their environment.

[simaishi]

@tinaafitz Thank you for the update!

[billfitzgerald0120]

I created a talk topic that includes instructions for customers to manually apply the code changes in their environment. http://talk.manageiq.org/t/quota-problems-with-vm-memory-in-a-service-dialog/4748