Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move SchemaMigration model from ManageIQ to ManageIQ::Schema plugin #175

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 2, 2018

Conversation

bdunne
Copy link
Member

@bdunne bdunne commented Feb 28, 2018

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Feb 28, 2018

Checked commit bdunne@fec46b1 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
1 file checked, 3 offenses detected

app/models/schema_migration.rb

@bdunne
Copy link
Member Author

bdunne commented Mar 1, 2018

@Fryguy Please review

@Fryguy Fryguy merged commit bf42ada into ManageIQ:master Mar 2, 2018
@Fryguy Fryguy added the bug label Mar 2, 2018
@Fryguy Fryguy added this to the Sprint 81 Ending Mar 12, 2018 milestone Mar 2, 2018
@Fryguy Fryguy self-assigned this Mar 2, 2018
@bdunne bdunne deleted the schema_migration branch March 2, 2018 21:12
simaishi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Move SchemaMigration model from ManageIQ to ManageIQ::Schema plugin
(cherry picked from commit bf42ada)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553397
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Mar 8, 2018

Gaprindashvili backport details:

$ git log -1
commit 45dcef58852ebf062addd4d1b0908da8a5f16f55
Author: Jason Frey <fryguy9@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 2 15:52:47 2018 -0500

    Merge pull request #175 from bdunne/schema_migration
    
    Move SchemaMigration model from ManageIQ to ManageIQ::Schema plugin
    (cherry picked from commit bf42ada3662b64281b3b89b86ca5e6afc809def9)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553397

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants