Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use fonticon+background for powerstate icons in textual summaries #4524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 24, 2018

Conversation

skateman
Copy link
Member

@skateman skateman commented Aug 22, 2018

For now we were using SVG icons for powerstate, however, in the quadicons we already changed this to a fonticon+background combo. This PR brings the same thing for textual summaries 🎉

screenshot from 2018-08-23 16-55-01

Note that there might be a floating point issue on certain linux-based browsers (maybe even CPU family related, not sure), however, if you zoom in on the image, it will be perfectly centered.

screenshot from 2018-08-23 17-06-05

@miq-bot add_label graphics, textual summaries, gaprindashvili/no
@miq-bot add_reviewer @epwinchell

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 23, 2018

Checked commit skateman@7167e91 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

@skateman skateman changed the title [WIP] Use fonticon+background for powerstate icons in textual summaries Use fonticon+background for powerstate icons in textual summaries Aug 23, 2018
@miq-bot miq-bot removed the wip label Aug 23, 2018
@mzazrivec mzazrivec self-assigned this Aug 24, 2018
@mzazrivec mzazrivec added this to the Sprint 93 Ending Aug 27, 2018 milestone Aug 24, 2018
@mzazrivec mzazrivec merged commit 9718f72 into ManageIQ:master Aug 24, 2018
@skateman skateman deleted the summary-powerstate branch August 24, 2018 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants