Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow cloud volume to provide list of supported VMs for attachment #601

Merged

Conversation

gberginc
Copy link
Contributor

@gberginc gberginc commented Mar 6, 2017

With the introduction of Amazon EBS block storage manager, the UI should
no longer on cloud tenant of a cloud volume to provide the list of VMs
that the volume can be attached to. EBS has no notion of tenants. It
does, however, require that the volume resides in the same availability
zone as the instance to which volume is being attached.

This patch therefore asks the cloud volume to provide the list of
instances that it can be attached to.

Depends on: ManageIQ/manageiq#14058

@miq-bot add_label storage,pending core

With the introduction of Amazon EBS block storage manager, the UI should
no longer on cloud tenant of a cloud volume to provide the list of VMs
that the volume can be attached to. EBS has no notion of tenants. It
does, however, require that the volume resides in the same availability
zone as the instance to which volume is being attached.

This patch therefore asks the cloud volume to provide the list of
instances that it can be attached to.
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 6, 2017

Checked commit gberginc@11e5c4c with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍰

@dclarizio
Copy link

Removed pending core label as the PR is merged.

@mzazrivec mzazrivec added this to the Sprint 56 Ending Mar 13, 2017 milestone Mar 8, 2017
@dclarizio dclarizio removed this from the Sprint 56 Ending Mar 13, 2017 milestone Mar 8, 2017
@dclarizio
Copy link

@mzazrivec I reset the milestone as we don't set that until merge and we are awaiting a review from @blomquisg

@gberginc
Copy link
Contributor Author

gberginc commented Mar 9, 2017

@blomquisg @dclarizio OpenStack and Amazon providers have been updated with this method, so we should be able to merge this as well.

@dclarizio dclarizio merged commit d57d3d6 into ManageIQ:master Mar 10, 2017
@dclarizio dclarizio added this to the Sprint 56 Ending Mar 13, 2017 milestone Mar 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants