Allow node reselect in trees where is no other way to get back #872
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Checked commits skateman/manageiq-ui-classic@2e13235~...1d404e5 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0 |
simaishi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2017
Allow node reselect in trees where is no other way to get back (cherry picked from commit e5dbbad) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438521
|
Fine backport details: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some views are displaying lists of elements that are not available on the left-side tree. If an element's summary screen is being displayed, there is nothing to select in the left-side tree, so it remains on the previously highlighted element, making it unclickable. This allows reselection in such cases, as it allows clicking on an already selected treenode.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438361