-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Resource Pool Identifiers and UI for Cloud and Infrastructure Categorization #22879
Open
Guddetisandeep
wants to merge
1
commit into
ManageIQ:master
Choose a base branch
from
Guddetisandeep:resource_pool
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To solve the UI navigation issue caused by using the same
resource_pool
identifier for bothcloud and infrastructure menu_section
for resource_pools in default_menu.rb, I've created separate identifiers for both infrastructure and cloud resource pools, which resolves the UI navigation problem.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jeffibm is it expected that the same product feature would cause navigation issues in the UI?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @agrare ,
I think we can reuse them.
For example -
I duplicated an entry in
manageiq
, the identifiers are the same here (physical_chassis_show_list
)and added the corresponding entry in
ui-classic
-Menu method definition
This worked and would redirect to the same URL when clicked on
Chassis
andChassis2
.In this case
/physical_chassis/show_list#/
From the above example in ui-classic, I have used the menu item-id as
physical_chassis2
.The only problem I have seen so far is, If we use
physical_chassis
instead, it is going to complain about duplicate ids.Did I answer your question?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm this might be the problem @Guddetisandeep is having though, I don't think we want them redirecting to the same page.