Change package name to gi-gobject #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Actually I appreciate your interest. With |
|
I think that it is a good opportunity to continue/improve my bindings generator. I am currently working on testing For now I keep your C implementation, but I think that the next step should be to add support for converter to Array in GLib2 and use them in the bindings generator. It would be great if we can find a way to organize our work. |
@cedlemo I'm really looking forward to this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added the
gi-prefix for the GLib2 package because user can directly see that it is generated with gobject-introspection. I changed the name of the package for the sake of consistency. This is not mandatory. The decision is yours. :)